Low versus high dead space syringes: user preferences and attitudes

Project aims

We aimed to find out whether people who inject drugs would be willing to switch to this new, safer equipment.

What we did

We reviewed the existing research on these syringes and whether people minded using them. We also interviewed 23 people who inject drugs, and 13 volunteers and professionals who work with them, from Bristol and Bath. We aimed to explore their views on detachable low dead space syringes, and decide whether any additional support is needed to encourage their use.

How we involved people

The Bristol Drugs Project (BDP) provides needle exchange services in Bristol. People who use BDP’s services were on the project steering group. Involving people who inject drugs was vital. They offered important insights into our findings and plans for implementation.

It can be a challenge to engage with people who inject drugs because of their addictions and circumstances. BDP identified which of their service would be willing and able to participate in the steering group, and helped them attend meetings.

From the BDP service user perspective, this project was an enjoyable and empowering experience. We learnt how valuable it is to enable their engagement, through practical support and by making an effort to explain the terms used during meetings.

What we found and what this means

Decisions about injecting, including the choice of equipment, where to inject on the body and whether to rinse or re-use equipment, were influenced by a number of things. These included early experiences and being shown how to inject by others, and availability and awareness of alternative equipment. Avoiding or minimising problems such as difficulties finding a vein, vein damage and collapse, or pain due to abscesses and infections was also a factor.

The relationship between rinsing and re-using syringes was complex: not rinsing risked re-use of unclean syringes if there was a shortage, while rinsing could encourage re-use.

Most people who inject drugs found it difficult to change injecting equipment. If there weren’t any problems they saw no need to change and preferred using their usual equipment. However, if they did experience problems they tried to address them, and if there was a perceived benefit they may be willing to consider change.

An important barrier to change was prioritising getting a hit quickly over preventing future problems. As one participant said:

“I don’t want to get infections … Because I can be quite lax on thinking this stuff at the time, so I think that is quite important. Yeah definitely, lower the risk of transferring infections. (…) You get the thinking of I will deal with it later, if I get an illness I will deal with it later.”

Needles and syringes were not only a tool for injecting the drug, but they also formed part of a familiar routine. We thought it was likely people would be frustrated by having to change from familiar equipment, but that most people would be willing to try the new syringes if they understood the benefits. We thought they’d continue using them if they worked as well as the original equipment.

Our research found support among people who inject drugs for the new equipment. They valued the benefits of less wasted drug, as there is less left in the syringe after injecting. They also valued the lower risk of transferring infections. Another participant commented:

“Less waste is obvious isn’t it, no-one wants to waste anything in life, but drugs, since it is our obsession, it’s the most important thing.”

A needle exchange staff member said:

“It’s a really helpful intervention (…) I don’t have to talk about diseases and viruses and stuff, but these syringes here, you get absolutely all your drug.”

For needle exchanges, we have developed recommendations for introducing detachable low dead space syringes, based on our findings from the review and interviews. These include:

• training needle and syringe programme staff
• education for people who inject drugs
• offering a few low dead space syringes to try with usual equipment, and eventual restriction of the usual equipment

Alongside the introduction of the new syringes, encouraging appropriate rinsing methods among those known to re-use or share equipment may also be necessary.

What next?

This research has helped Bristol Drugs Project to anticipate and respond to people’s worries about low dead space syringes. Some people using their service are now beginning to accept them.

We have developed materials to support introducing these syringes, including a flyer for needle exchanges to inform people who inject drugs about the new equipment. We are also developing a step-by-step guide for needle exchanges.

Our findings are relevant to the National Institute of Clinical Excellence and Care (NICE) who produce guidance for needle exchanges.

Rachel Ayres, Volunteer Manager, and Jane Neale, Needle Exchange Manager for Bristol Drugs Project, said:

“The materials developed by the research team will help us to continue to increase the number of people who switch to low dead space syringes. We believe they will also be useful to support other needle and syringe programmes to introduce low dead space syringes effectively too.”